For OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) leaders, Finished Vehicle Logistics (FVL) is not just a cost line. It is a moving extension of the plant, the dealer network, and ultimately the brand. When outbound flows are stable, production plans hold, dealers stay supplied, and customers receive the vehicles they expect. When they are not, the impact is visible from factory yards all the way to the boardroom.
Across programs and vehicle lines, three priorities tend to define how OEM executives and plant logistics managers judge a finished vehicle logistics partner: plant evacuation efficiency, damage-free delivery ratio, and lead time achievement. Together, these KPIs show whether a carrier is supporting or straining the OEM’s broader strategy.
In this article, we look at these priorities from an OEM perspective and explain how our team, as an asset-based car-hauling carrier serving the lower 48 states, structures our operations around them.
Inside OEMs, FVL is increasingly treated as a strategic function. It connects stable, high-investment production assets with volatile market demand, evolving dealer expectations, and tight customer delivery promises. Outbound logistics is expected to absorb shocks from rail, ports, weather, and labor while still presenting a stable picture to the rest of the organization.
At the executive level, leaders focus on questions such as:
At the plant logistics level, teams face a different reality. They manage yard congestion, handoffs from the line to the transport yard, gate operations, and daily coordination with carriers. For them, the key questions are:
That is why OEM contracts and quarterly business reviews tend to revolve around a small set of KPIs. Plant evacuation, damage-free delivery, and lead time achievement turn high-level objectives into measurable performance, and they are the lens through which carriers are evaluated.
Plant evacuation efficiency is often treated as a local, operational issue, but its impact reaches far beyond the yard. When outbound vehicles do not leave on schedule, yards fill up quickly. Space becomes constrained, vehicle handling increases, and plant teams are forced to manage around congestion instead of focusing on smooth production.
If this persists, OEMs may be forced to slow down line rates, change sequencing, or rely on additional storage, all of which carry direct and indirect costs. Dealers may see delays in receiving inventory, especially on new models or critical trims. Executive teams see the results as increased working capital and growing pressure on production planning.
For that reason, many OEMs define plant evacuation efficiency as a central KPI. It is less about one truck arriving a few hours late and more about the consistent ability to keep yards in balance and production protected.
In practice, plant evacuation often comes down to a simple relationship between “Ready For Transport” (RFT) and actual pickup by the carrier. The most common forms of measurement include:
These measures typically live inside OEM dashboards and scorecards. They show up in regular operational calls and quarterly reviews, and they directly influence sourcing decisions and allocation of volume among carriers. A partner that cannot keep dwell times within agreed windows, especially during volume spikes, will be flagged quickly.
As an asset-based car-hauling company serving OEM programs across the lower 48 states, we structure our operations to align with each OEM’s evacuation targets and yard realities.
We work around a few core practices:
In short, our goal is to keep plant evacuation performance in line with what we have agreed together with each OEM. Being asset-based allows us to make routing and capacity decisions directly, rather than relying on third-party carriers to execute.
While units leaving the plant on time is critical, it matters just as much what condition they are in when they arrive at their destination. Transport-related damages have a direct impact on cost and a longer-term impact on brand.
Every damaged vehicle represents additional inspection, documentation, repair time, and potential delays before the dealer can deliver it to a customer. On high-visibility vehicles or launches, even a small number of transport damages can feel disproportionate. They also affect dealer confidence: if a dealer expects issues on arrival, that shapes orders and customer conversations.
For these reasons, OEMs pay close attention to damage-free delivery ratio. Many OEMs expect performance around 99% damage-free, especially on core programs and premium vehicles, and they benchmark carriers against each other based on this metric.
Damage-free performance is measured at arrival, but OEMs also look behind the numbers. They ask:
A low damage rate without credible process behind it is unlikely to earn long-term trust. OEMs want to see both a strong ratio and a robust approach to preventing and handling damages.
Across our OEM work, our performance is around 99% damage-free on transported vehicles. That outcome is supported by several operational practices we apply consistently across our fleet:
Behind these practices, we maintain robust carrier insurance appropriate for OEM programs. We do not lead the conversation with insurance, but it is there to support the operational standards we set.
Lead time achievement is the delivery-side counterpart to plant evacuation. It measures how consistently vehicles reach their next node or final destination within the agreed time window. OEMs define lead times by lane and node — for example, plant to dealer, plant to rail ramp, or port to dealer — and they track how often shipments arrive on time.
From an OEM perspective, this KPI ties directly into:
Lead time achievement is typically measured as a percentage of vehicles delivered within the agreed window, rather than as an average. This keeps the focus on reliability, not just speed.
Many of the risks to lead time sit outside the OEM’s direct control: severe weather, infrastructure disruptions, local traffic issues, rail or port congestion, and unexpected volume spikes. OEM executives know these factors exist and generally do not expect them to disappear.
What they do expect is that their carriers:
A partner who treats disruptions as occasional excuses rather than operational challenges will quickly fall out of favor.
On our side, we focus on building lead time performance into how we plan and operate, rather than treating it as an after-the-fact metric.
That means:
Because we operate nationwide across the lower 48 states, we can support multi-region OEM programs with a consistent approach to lead time achievement, even when lanes and volumes change.
Plant evacuation, damage-free delivery, and lead time achievement are only as useful as the visibility behind them. OEM leaders increasingly expect real-time and near real-time insight into their networks, not just periodic summary reports.
Key expectations include:
A carrier’s ability to provide this visibility often becomes a deciding factor when OEMs select long-term partners.
We have shaped our approach to visibility and governance around these expectations:
Being asset-based supports this visibility. Because we control the trucks, drivers, and many of the underlying processes, the data we share reflects our own operations rather than a patchwork of third-party inputs.
“Asset-based” is more than a label in our industry. For OEMs, it signals that the carrier owns and operates the equipment and employs the drivers who move their vehicles. That structure has a direct impact on the KPIs that executives care about.
With our own fleet, we can:
In contrast, a purely brokerage-based model may rely on a rotating pool of third-party carriers with varied standards, equipment, and processes. That can introduce variability into the very KPIs OEMs want to stabilize.
The advantages of an asset-based model show up directly in the three OEM priorities:
For OEM executives and plant logistics managers, working with an asset-based partner is one way to de-risk outbound operations while maintaining flexibility in the network.
How do you adapt plant evacuation targets for different OEMs and plants?
We align plant evacuation targets with each OEM’s specific requirements and production patterns. For plants that operate with a 24–48 hour RFT-to-pickup window, we plan capacity and scheduling to stay within that range whenever possible and review performance regularly with local and central teams.
Can you support multi-plant or multi-region OEM programs across the lower 48 states?
Yes. We operate across the lower 48 states and can support programs that span multiple plants, regions, and dealer networks. We design routes and fleet allocations to reflect each OEM’s lane structure and adjust as those networks evolve.
How do you handle exceptions when weather or infrastructure issues threaten lead times?
When external events put lead times at risk, we focus on early communication and practical options. Our account managers inform OEM contacts, explain the likely impact, and work on adjustments such as resequencing loads or prioritizing certain lanes to protect the broader plan.
What kind of visibility and reporting can OEM executives expect on their vehicles and KPIs?
OEM teams receive VIN-level tracking links through our portal and regular KPI reports covering plant evacuation, damage-free performance, and lead time achievement. We also offer dedicated account management and structured review meetings to turn these metrics into actionable decisions.
For OEM leaders, Finished Vehicle Logistics is a key link between the factory, the dealer network, and the customer. While rate per mile will always matter, the real test of a carrier is its performance on three core priorities: plant evacuation efficiency, damage-free delivery, and lead time achievement.
Our team focuses on these KPIs in the way we design, operate, and govern our OEM programs. By combining an asset-based fleet, nationwide coverage across the lower 48 states, strong damage prevention practices, and VIN-level visibility, we aim to support OEM production plans, protect brand reputation, and keep dealer commitments credible.
If you are responsible for outbound vehicle logistics at an OEM, a practical next step is to look at your current KPIs and where they fall short of your targets. How often are plants running close to yard capacity, how stable are your damage-free ratios, and how reliable is lead time performance across regions?
From there, it may be helpful to compare what you see internally with what you expect from an asset-based finished vehicle logistics partner. Our team can walk through your current network, discuss your program-specific goals, and explore how an asset-based approach to plant evacuation, damage prevention, and lead time achievement can support your next phase of growth.
Stay informed on the latest news and insights from GB Cargo.
