Which Equipment Type Should OEMs Require From Finished-Vehicle Carriers?

Learn which carrier equipment specs OEMs should require—securement, air-ride, fleet age, capacity fit, tracking, and service recovery.
GB Cargo car hauling trucks parked in the with a beautiful sunset in the backround.

OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer — the vehicle maker) logistics teams are expected to protect three things at once: damage-free delivery, reliable ETAs, and cost-efficient capacity. When a load is delayed or a new unit arrives with transport-related damage, the impact shows up immediately—at plants, ports, rail ramps, and dealerships.

That’s why “equipment type” can’t be treated as a carrier-side detail. The equipment a finished-vehicle carrier runs—securement system, ride quality, trailer configuration, and visibility tools—directly influences risk, reliability, and day-to-day execution. Equipment age matters too, because it affects mechanical downtime risk and how consistently a carrier can deliver against tight schedules.

Below, we break down the equipment requirements OEMs should define in RFQs and carrier scorecards, and we share how we operate for OEM moves: our equipment ranges from brand new to 4 years old (oldest), we use soft-tie securement for OEM vehicles, all of our equipment is air-ride, we typically run 7–9 cars per load depending on vehicle size and weight, we do not offer enclosed, our damage-free performance is 99.9%, and we proactively manage exceptions (including mechanical issues) with clear customer updates.

Why “equipment type” is a selection decision, not a dispatch detail

Many OEM teams think of equipment type as “open vs. enclosed.” In finished-vehicle logistics, it’s broader than that. Equipment type is the full system that drives outcomes across four practical areas:

  • Risk & reliability: How often equipment fails, how quickly a carrier can recover, and whether ETAs hold.
  • Capacity & efficiency: How many vehicles can be moved per load safely and legally, given the OEM’s actual vehicle mix.
  • Vehicle protection: Securement methods and ride quality that reduce damage exposure during transit.
  • Visibility & execution: How consistently updates, documentation, and exception management are handled.

When these elements are defined and enforced, performance becomes more predictable across lanes, seasons, and volume swings.

The hidden cost of the wrong spec

The wrong equipment spec doesn’t only create damage risk. It creates operational friction:

  • Loads that don’t match promised capacity because the trailer configuration can’t support the actual vehicle mix.
  • More “workarounds” during loading that increase risk (tight clearances, steeper angles, rushed adjustments).
  • Less predictable ETAs because downtime recovery plans aren’t strong enough.
  • Gaps in tracking and paperwork that force OEM teams to chase status updates.

Over time, those issues become real costs—rework, claims administration, manual follow-ups, and missed dealer or distribution commitments.

Equipment age and reliability: what “new to 4 years old” changes in real operations

In finished-vehicle logistics, equipment age is often a proxy for reliability. As power units and trailers get older, mechanical breakdown risk and unplanned downtime typically increase. And in OEM networks, downtime isn’t just “a carrier problem.” It disrupts Just-in-Time (JIT) logistics (a scheduling approach where inventory arrives when needed, not early) and can quickly cascade into missed appointments and dealer promise issues.

When a truck breaks down mid-route, the common consequences include:

  • missed appointment windows or late delivery commitments
  • last-minute repowers (replacement trucks) that add complexity and delay
  • increased handling events if a load must be transferred, which can increase risk

Our equipment ranges from brand new to 4 years old (oldest). In our experience, keeping fleet age tight helps reduce preventable service failures because it supports more consistent uptime and faster maintenance cycles.

Breakdown response planning (what OEMs should ask)

Even with newer equipment, OEMs should evaluate the service recovery plan, not just the spec sheet. Our approach is straightforward:

  • If it’s a fast fix, we fix it quickly and continue without turning it into a bigger disruption.
  • If it’s not a fast fix, we replace the equipment (swap in another unit) so the load keeps moving.
  • We keep customers informed throughout, so OEM teams aren’t left guessing.

When OEMs qualify carriers, we recommend asking:

  • What triggers a repair vs. a repower?
  • How quickly can you stage replacement equipment on major lanes?
  • How do you communicate exceptions (timing, options, documentation)?

Clear, specific answers here usually correlate with fewer surprises during peak volume.

Open transport is the OEM default—so protection has to come from the spec

For most OEM volume moves, open transport is the standard approach. That means protection doesn’t come from a hard shell around the vehicle. It comes from securement, ride quality, handling discipline, and consistent execution.

We operate in that same reality:

  • We do not offer enclosed transport.
  • We focus on equipment and processes that reduce risk on open loads: soft-tie securement, air-ride equipment, disciplined load planning, and consistent documentation.

Callout: Our OEM baseline spec (facts only)

  • Fleet age: brand new to 4 years old (oldest)
  • Securement: soft-tie securement (straps designed to reduce contact risk) for OEM finished vehicles
  • Ride: air-ride (air suspension designed to reduce vibration/road shock) across our equipment
  • Typical capacity: 7–9 cars per load depending on vehicle type and weight
  • Visibility: tracking, proactive status updates, and ePOD (electronic proof of delivery — digital delivery confirmation)

Securement systems: why soft-ties are the standard for new OEM vehicles

Securement is one of the most direct drivers of damage exposure in finished-vehicle logistics. For new units—where cosmetic condition matters—OEM programs often prefer securement methods designed to reduce contact risk and improve repeatability across drivers.

For OEM moves, we use soft-tie securement. Chains are used only for heavier equipment moves, which typically isn’t the use case for new OEM cars.

What “soft-tie” actually controls

Soft-tie securement systems aim to reduce damage risk in a few practical ways:

  • Lower contact risk: Proper strap/soft-tie methods reduce the chance of metal-on-metal contact and related cosmetic issues.
  • Repeatability: A standardized method is easier to train, audit, and execute consistently across drivers.
  • Stable tension under movement: Consistent anchoring and tension help reduce shifting risk during transit.

No securement method replaces careful loading and driving. But standardization reduces variability—and variability is often where claims originate.

OEM checklist: securement questions to ask every carrier

Here’s what we recommend OEM teams include in RFQs and carrier qualification:

  • What securement method is used by default on new vehicles?
  • Under what conditions do exceptions happen (if any), and who approves them?
  • How are drivers trained and refreshed on securement procedures?
  • Do you have a securement audit process (spot checks, QC at pickup, post-load photos)?
  • How do you handle mixed loads (sedans, SUVs, EVs) where tie-down points vary?

If a carrier can’t answer clearly, it’s hard to enforce consistency later.

Ride quality: air-ride vs. leaf-spring and why it shows up in claims outcomes

Ride quality is easy to overlook until there’s a problem. Road vibration and shock can contribute to cosmetic issues, component stress, and “mystery damage” disputes—especially across long lanes or rough seasonal routes.

We run air-ride across our equipment. Air-ride (air suspension) is designed to reduce vibration and road shock compared to harsher systems, which supports more consistent handling across a nationwide network.

For OEMs, ride quality should be treated as part of the protection system—not a comfort feature.

Capacity and load-factor economics: 7-car vs. higher-capacity and the flexibility advantage

Capacity is often discussed like a single number: “How many cars can you haul?” In real OEM networks, the better question is: “How reliably can you haul the right mix—safely, legally, and consistently?”

Trailer configuration and flexibility influence:

  • how many units can be loaded without forcing tight clearances
  • how weight is distributed to stay compliant
  • how well a carrier adapts when vehicle mix shifts (more SUVs, heavier EVs, different dimensions)

For us, the realistic operating range is typically 7–9 cars per load, depending on the type and weight of the vehicles. That range reflects what can be done consistently on real lanes and real mixes—not a best-case maximum.

Why “maximum capacity” isn’t always the right KPI

OEM mixes change. SUVs and crossovers consume more deck space. EV (electric vehicle — battery-powered) models can be heavier, which can reduce legal capacity depending on configuration and weight distribution.

If a carrier is pressured to “hit max capacity” regardless of mix, risk can rise:

  • tighter clearances (more chances for contact)
  • more aggressive loading angles and adjustments
  • rushed decisions to make a load fit

We generally see better outcomes when OEMs align capacity expectations to the actual vehicle profile and allow for a realistic average per load.

What to ask about trailer configuration

When evaluating equipment type for OEMs, we recommend focusing on how the trailer handles variety:

  • Can it adapt to a mixed profile (sedans + SUVs + heavier units)?
  • How does the carrier plan loads to avoid “problem combinations”?
  • What’s the approach to safe/legal weight distribution?
  • How does the carrier prevent rushed loading decisions that increase damage exposure?

Strong carriers explain how they plan loads—not only the maximum they’ve ever carried.

Visibility and execution: tools matter, but consistency matters more

OEM teams increasingly expect structured visibility, reliable status updates, and digital documentation. The biggest operational gap we see in the industry isn’t usually the absence of a tool—it’s inconsistent execution.

We provide:

  • shipment tracking
  • proactive updates (especially when exceptions occur)
  • ePOD (electronic proof of delivery — digital delivery confirmation)

Depending on an OEM’s systems and requirements, carriers may also be asked about EDI (Electronic Data Interchange — structured system-to-system data exchange) or API (Application Programming Interface — software connection for data sharing). Whether or not deep integration is needed, the baseline expectation should be consistent status communication and clean documentation.

Communication standards that prevent escalations

In our experience, OEM escalation risk drops when updates are standardized. A practical baseline includes:

  • Dispatch confirmation: load accepted, driver assigned, estimated pickup timing
  • Pickup confirmation: pickup completed and documented
  • In-transit updates: milestone updates and ETA confidence
  • Exception updates: fast notice + clear options when something changes
  • Delivery confirmation: ePOD + final status

OEMs can (and should) define these expectations as part of carrier qualification.

The OEM equipment evaluation scorecard

To make equipment decisions consistent across lanes and vendors, we recommend a scorecard approach. Below is a practical rubric OEMs can adopt and tune.

Suggested scoring weights (example)

  1. Fleet age band & reliability plan (25%)
  • age range, maintenance discipline, clear breakdown response plan
  1. Securement standardization (25%)
  • soft-tie baseline, training, auditability, exception controls
  1. Ride quality (15%)
  • air-ride availability and consistency
  1. Capacity fit & flexibility (20%)
  • how well the trailer configuration matches real vehicle mixes and lane profiles
  1. Visibility & documentation (15%)
  • tracking, proactive updates, ePOD, structured exception management

You can adjust weights based on lane volatility, seasonal risk, and vehicle profile.

Minimum requirements vs. “nice-to-haves”

Minimum requirements (typical OEM baseline):

  • consistent securement standard (soft-tie for new units)
  • reliable ride quality (air-ride preferred)
  • a credible reliability plan with repair/repower response
  • visibility with tracking + ePOD

Nice-to-haves (program dependent):

  • deeper system integrations (EDI/API)
  • enhanced photo documentation
  • additional QC checkpoints at pickup/delivery

Red flags that predict claims and service failures

These are common warning signs we recommend OEMs screen for:

  • “We usually do straps, but sometimes chains” without a defined exception policy
  • vague answers on fleet age and maintenance cadence
  • no credible repower plan for major lanes
  • inconsistent tracking or unclear documentation practices
  • capacity promises that don’t reflect real vehicle mixes

If these show up during qualification, they tend to show up again under pressure.

FAQ

What equipment type should OEMs require for finished-vehicle moves?

We recommend OEMs define equipment type as a package: soft-tie securement, air-ride equipment, trailer configuration that fits the OEM’s vehicle mix, and consistent visibility with ePOD (electronic proof of delivery — digital delivery confirmation). When those elements are standardized, damage exposure and service variability typically drop.

Is open transport safe enough for new OEM vehicles?

Open transport is the common standard for OEM volume moves, but safety depends on the controls around it. Soft-tie securement, air-ride equipment, disciplined loading practices, and clear exception management are what make open transport dependable for new units.

Why do soft-ties matter more than “being careful”?

Driver care is essential, but OEM programs need repeatability across many drivers, lanes, and volumes. Soft-tie securement provides a standardized method that can be trained, audited, and executed consistently—reducing the chances that small handling differences become damage events.

How does fleet age affect on-time delivery for OEM lanes?

Older equipment tends to carry higher breakdown and out-of-service risk, which can disrupt appointment windows and dealer delivery promises. Newer fleets paired with a clear repair/repower plan reduce downtime exposure and make service recovery faster when exceptions happen.

Conclusion

For OEM finished-vehicle logistics, equipment type isn’t a technical footnote—it’s a practical predictor of outcomes. Securement standards, ride quality, capacity fit for real vehicle mixes, and consistent visibility all influence damage exposure and on-time reliability. Equipment age matters because it affects downtime risk and how quickly a carrier can recover when something goes wrong.

When OEMs define equipment requirements clearly—and evaluate carriers against those requirements—performance becomes more predictable across lanes, seasons, and volume changes.

Related Insights

A GB Cargo car hauling truck loaded with cars during fleet relocation
Driving Fleet Vehicles vs. Professional Car Hauling for Business Relocations
Read more
A GB Cargo car hauling truck loaded with cars, parked at a rest area.
Do Car Auctions Work Directly With Car Hauling Carriers or Through Managed Freight?
Read more
A GB Cargo car hauling truck loaded with cars.
How Small Dealerships Grow Faster by Buying and Selling Cars Out of State
Read more
Two GB Cargo's car hauling truck loaded with cars.
What High-Performing Rental Fleets Have in Common in Their Auto Transport Programs
Read more

Get Expert Transport Insights

Stay informed on the latest news and insights from GB Cargo.